Jill Stien

The statement '@DidaidaK @Columbia 💚' is a response in a thread involving political figures and topics, including a direct engagement with a controversial political stance. The use of a heart emoji suggests a positive or supportive sentiment towards the preceding statement or the context it was used in. However, the statement itself lacks substantive content or a clear position on the issues being discussed in the thread, such as political endorsements or international law violations.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not cause harm but also does not contribute meaningfully to the discourse.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It respects the dignity of others by not including harmful language. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion due to its lack of substantive content.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   There is no engagement in constructive criticism or dialogue.
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   There is no acknowledgment or correction of mistakes as the statement is too vague.
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The use of influence is neutral; it neither benefits nor detracts significantly from societal betterment.
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement does not uphold the principles of free speech in a substantive way due to its lack of content.