Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 303

The statement and linked articles engage in public discourse by discussing the safety and effectiveness of Tesla's Autopilot and Full Self-Driving features, as well as the broader implications of public trust in technology and media. The discourse involves analysis of a retracted academic paper and its impact on public perception and safety concerns related to autonomous driving technology.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to inform and caution about the potential dangers of Tesla's driver-assist features, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects the dignity of others by focusing on safety and the implications of misinformation, without engaging in personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by linking to detailed analyses and discussions about the technology and its reported issues. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It encourages a critical approach to technological adoption and media reporting, fostering constructive criticism. [+2]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement acknowledges the retraction of a significant paper, demonstrating a commitment to correcting misinformation. [+2]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By discussing the implications of technology on safety, the statement uses its influence to potentially better societal understanding and safety standards. [+2]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by fostering open discussion about the reliability and safety of widely used technology. [+1]