Marianne Williamson

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 259
4/27/2024, 3:53:39 AM
X
In reply to:
SHEEDOM
@SheedomUSA
·
13d
@NewsLoonie @marwilliamson No people need to follow the laws.
Loonie News
@NewsLoonie
·
14d
@marwilliamson those cops need to be jailed

dogs need to be leashed
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
14d
This is not acceptable.
Natasha Barnes
@UICProfWatch
·
14d
@MiddleEastEye Here’s @EmoryUniversity economics professor Caroline Fohlin knocked to the ground with her head on the concrete. Her glasses are thrown off. She shouts “I’m a professor”
#Gaza #Protesters

The statement '@SheedomUSA @NewsLoonie What laws was she violating?' is part of a larger conversation about law enforcement and public protests. The user is questioning the legal basis for the actions taken against an individual, presumably in the context of a protest. This question implies a concern for legal standards and justice.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement promotes a discussion on legal accountability, which is crucial for a functioning society. It encourages a review of actions against legal standards, thus contributing positively to public discourse. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    By questioning the legality of actions taken, the statement respects the dignity of the individual involved, assuming their right to lawful treatment. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The question fosters a dialogue about the application of laws in public protests, promoting understanding and potentially leading to a more informed public. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The user uses their platform to question potential misuse of power, which could lead to societal betterment if it prompts accountability and transparency. [+1]