Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 303

The statement 'When @beffjezos and I both smell the stench of regulatory capture, you know it’s bad.' is a critical commentary on the perceived issue of regulatory capture in relation to the establishment of the Artificial Intelligence Safety and Security Board. The tone is informal and uses metaphorical language to express disapproval and concern about the influence of corporations or vested interests on regulatory bodies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight a potential issue of harm in governance, suggesting that regulatory capture is detrimental to public interest. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of others by not targeting individuals but rather commenting on the system. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The use of metaphorical language ('stench of regulatory capture') serves to emphasize the speaker's disapproval and provoke thought, contributing to a broader dialogue on governance and ethics in AI. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement encourages reflection and dialogue about the influence of corporations in regulatory processes, which is crucial for public understanding and accountability. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By raising concerns about regulatory capture, the statement uses its platform to potentially better societal understanding and governance structures. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement responsibly uses the platform to discuss important issues of public governance and corporate influence, aligning with the principle of integrity in public discourse. [+1]