Jake Tapper

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 318

The statement provided describes a news segment that reports on a protest leader at Columbia University using hateful, antisemitic language. The content is a factual report on an event and includes a description of the nature of the language used by the protest leader. The statement itself does not endorse or promote the hateful language but reports on its occurrence, which is a significant aspect of journalistic reporting on public events and issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm but reports on harmful behavior, which is crucial for public awareness. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of others by not endorsing the hateful speech but reporting on it as a matter of public concern. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement indirectly promotes understanding by highlighting the occurrence of hate speech in a public protest, which is important for public discourse on such issues. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement itself does not engage in dialogue but provides a platform for public awareness and potential dialogue among viewers. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement is factual and does not appear to contain errors based on the information provided. [+1]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to inform the public about significant events, contributing to societal awareness. [+1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by reporting on the event without suppressing the unpleasant aspects of the protest leader's speech, which is important for a transparent and informed public discourse. [+1]