Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is a critique of police actions at Columbia University, linking them to broader geopolitical issues. It uses sarcasm to express disapproval of perceived excessive police presence and its implications on international affairs. The tone is confrontational and sarcastic, and the content touches on issues of public safety, anti-Semitism, and international conflict.
- The statement may harm reputations and escalate tensions by sarcastically criticizing police actions and linking them to international violence. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of those involved, using sarcasm to undermine the actions of the police and political figures. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The sarcastic tone reduces the potential for promoting understanding or compassion between different viewpoints. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of dialogue but does so in a manner that may not constructively address disagreements. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge the complexities of the issues at hand, instead using hyperbole and sarcasm. [-1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The use of sarcasm and controversial statements may not contribute positively to societal betterment. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement uses the platform to express a critical viewpoint but may not uphold the integrity expected in responsible public discourse. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.