Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement describes a violent incident at UCLA, attributing the violence to a 'Zionist mob' and comparing the scene to the West Bank. This statement is charged with political and ethnic implications and could potentially inflame tensions.
- The statement may indirectly cause harm by using charged language that could exacerbate tensions between different groups. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of all parties involved by using a blanket term 'Zionist mob', which could be seen as derogatory and overly generalizing. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The comparison to the West Bank may not promote understanding or empathy, as it could be viewed as an oversimplification of complex international issues. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; instead, it seems to be accusatory and polarizing. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- There is no indication of an effort to verify or correct the information, which is crucial in such a sensitive context. [-1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The use of such language in describing the event does not appear to use influence for the betterment of society but rather could lead to further division. [-2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.