Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement reports on an incident during a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing, highlighting the lack of attention given to Sudan by U.S. senators, as evidenced by their absence during a testimony. The content focuses on a specific event related to U.S. foreign policy and the conduct of its senators, which is a matter of public interest and concern.
- The statement does no harm with words or actions, simply reporting on an observed situation. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, not targeting any individual senator but commenting on the collective action. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement indirectly promotes understanding by highlighting the issue of limited attention to Sudan, which could foster greater awareness and empathy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out the senators' lack of presence, which is a critique of their professional conduct, not a personal attack. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By drawing attention to the issue of Sudan and the senators' conduct, the statement uses its influence to potentially better societal understanding and accountability. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement uses the platform responsibly, bringing attention to a public issue without misinformation or harmful content. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.