Gary Marcus

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 35
5/2/2024, 1:56:48 PM
X
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
502d
@YiMaTweets I gave it a go here: https://garymarcus.substack.com/…
Yi Ma
@YiMaTweets
·
502d
Again, please someone please define general intelligence, in a quantifiable or testable way? Instead of a PR slogan…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
502d
Nice try. We may be burning $50B+ a year but LLMs ≠ AGI.

The statement '@YiMaTweets Twitterverse largely accepted those criteria at the time' is part of a broader conversation about artificial general intelligence (AGI) and its implications. This conversation involves multiple stakeholders discussing the definition, expectations, and financial commitments related to AGI development. The statement itself is a response to a request for a clear, quantifiable definition of general intelligence, indicating an acceptance of certain criteria or definitions at a previous time.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm as it simply reflects on past acceptance of criteria without making any harmful claims or implications. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not involve personal information or target any individuals negatively. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by referencing a historical acceptance of criteria, which could help contextualize the discussion on AGI definitions. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by acknowledging past consensus, which could encourage further discussion on the topic. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    There is no indication of any mistakes being made or corrected in this statement.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence neutrally, as it neither significantly advances nor detracts from societal betterment.
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by contributing to a public discussion on an important technological and societal issue without misusing the platform. [+1]