Gary Marcus

Rank 23 of 47
|
Score 29

The statement is part of a Twitter conversation that revolves around the definition and expectations of artificial general intelligence (AGI). The discourse involves a critique of a CEO's expertise on the subject compared to those who originally coined the term AGI. The link provided leads to a more detailed discussion on the topic, suggesting a substantive engagement with public issues related to technology and its future impact. This qualifies as public discourse as it addresses societal issues concerning technological development and its implications.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm but critiques the qualifications of a CEO to discuss AGI, which could be seen as slightly negative.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The linked article aims to promote understanding by discussing AGI in depth, which could foster empathy and compassion towards the complexities of the topic. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by pointing out the lack of qualifications of a CEO to define AGI, encouraging dialogue based on expertise. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The discussion and the linked article aim to use influence to educate and provoke thoughtful consideration on AGI, aligning with the betterment of society by fostering informed discourse. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses the platform responsibly to engage in a meaningful discussion about AGI, upholding the principles of free speech. [+1]