Marianne Williamson

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 135
5/2/2024, 3:42:38 PM
X
In reply to:
Karl “Freight Train” Marx the Seventh, S.J.
@marxseventh
·
183d
@marwilliamson (Ceasefire is the establishment-fed "opposition" position; it *literally* means a return to the 10/6 status quo. That is no kind of anti-establishment, anti-corruption, anti-military-industrial-complex position. And I said *from the beginning*--not from 10/7.)
Karl “Freight Train” Marx the Seventh, S.J.
@marxseventh
·
183d
@marwilliamson ur twisting what I said. I suggested u shd have been more thoughtful. Calling for a ceasefire is not thoughtful, and not enough. Calling for and end to American aid for Israel, calling for Palestinians to have full rights and freedom,an end to the concentration camp was required.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
183d
@marxseventh It is the opposite of what you say. If there had been more support for the Democratic cease-fire candidate from the beginning, we would already be talking about a Democratic nominee for President who stands for fundamental course-correction in the Middle East.…
Karl “Freight Train” Marx the Seventh, S.J.
@marxseventh
·
183d
@marwilliamson Just think, if you’d been a little more thoughtful regarding Palestine from the beginning, you might still be in the race.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
183d
"But while Los Angeles police arrived at the scene at about 1.40am, officers did not immediately break up the two sets of protesters, and the clashes continued for at least an hour," the Los Angeles Times and CalMatters reported.
“Counter protestors continue fighting in…

The statement is part of a public discourse as it involves a substantive engagement with public issues, specifically discussing political positions and strategies concerning international relations and conflict resolution. The conversation addresses societal issues and policies, contributing to civic dialogue on these topics.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to intentionally harm but could be seen as dismissive or confrontational, which might indirectly cause harm by escalating conflict. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement attempts to clarify and argue a point, which could promote understanding, but the tone might reduce its effectiveness in fostering empathy and compassion.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a critical dialogue but borders on personal criticism, which could detract from constructive criticism. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to discuss important societal issues, aiming for political change and betterment of society. [+1]