Reposted by Ilhan Omar
The statement is a declaration of personal actions taken in the context of civil disobedience and peaceful protest, aligning with historical figures known for their roles in social and political change. The tone is assertive and proud, intending to justify and contextualize the speaker's actions as part of a broader American tradition of protest.
- The statement implies that the actions were non-violent ('peaceful protest', 'peaceful but committed disorder'), aiming to do no harm while disrupting for a cause. This aligns well with the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- There is no indication of disrespect towards the privacy and dignity of others, nor any engagement in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By invoking historical figures like Thomas Paine, David Thoreau, and Rosa Parks, the speaker promotes understanding and empathy for the tradition of civil disobedience as a means to achieve social change. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in dialogue but rather asserts the speaker's actions. However, it does not include personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on the actions and their historical context. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The speaker indicates using their influence to challenge and potentially better society through actions reminiscent of notable historical figures advocating for change. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.