Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement critiques the government's approach to handling gun control and its response to protests, suggesting a perceived inconsistency in protecting students from gun violence while using force in situations involving free speech. The tone is critical and implies a call for reflection on governmental priorities and actions.
- The statement aims to highlight a serious societal issue—gun violence and governmental response to protests—without causing harm but rather prompting discussion. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the dignity of those involved by focusing on systemic issues rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement encourages a reflection on the government's role, which could foster empathy towards those affected by gun violence and aggressive policing. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It invites dialogue on the consistency of government actions in different contexts, which is constructive. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to critique and potentially influence societal views on government actions and priorities. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- It responsibly uses the platform to discuss public safety and freedom of speech, aligning with the principle of integrity in public discourse. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.