Jill Stien

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -97

The statement is a political commentary expressing dissatisfaction with the Democratic Party and endorsing a third-party candidate. It includes a critique of the party's strategy or messaging and a personal decision on voting, which makes it a part of public discourse as it engages with political issues and electoral choices.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses harsh language ('shit show') which could be seen as harmful or offensive, thus not fully adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others in a broad sense but uses language that might be considered disrespectful to the entities involved (i.e., calling a political situation a 'shit show').
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, particularly with its dismissive tone towards one political group. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    While the statement engages in criticism, it includes language that could be seen as a personal attack ('shit show') rather than purely constructive criticism. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The endorsement of a third-party candidate could be seen as using influence for what the speaker believes is the betterment of society, though the approach and language used may undermine this intent. [+1]