Matt Taibbi

Rank 32 of 47
|
Score -20
5/2/2024, 7:07:47 PM
X
In reply to:
crispy pad thai
@crispypadthai
·
501d
@mtaibbi @kthalps katie what’s up with your podcast cohost
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
501d
No, they’re not. Shutting down events, shouting people down, blocking people from entering venues, that all violates the spirit and in some cases the letter of the First Amendment/free speech. Doing these things makes it hard to demand speech rights https://stanfordmag.org/contents…
Seth LeBlanc
@SethTheWhite
·
501d
@mtaibbi Those actions are also people exercising their right to speech, you don’t see the difference between that and armed agents of the state cracking down on peaceful protests?

The statement '@crispypadthai @kthalps He believes in free speech? I’m against the antisemitism laws as well.' is part of a broader conversation about free speech, antisemitism laws, and public discourse surrounding these issues. The statement directly engages with public issues, specifically the balance between free speech and legislation against hate speech, making it a part of public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the context of being 'against antisemitism laws' could be seen as potentially harmful depending on interpretation, as it might suggest opposition to measures designed to protect against hate speech.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks a clear promotion of understanding, empathy, or compassion, particularly in its brief opposition to antisemitism laws without further explanation. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on the issue of free speech and antisemitism laws. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to discuss important societal issues, though it could be more constructive in promoting societal betterment by providing more context or solutions.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of free speech by participating in a discussion about its limits and protections, though it could use its platform more responsibly by clarifying its stance on sensitive issues like antisemitism laws. [+1]