your momma aint name you no "molag bal"
@groaningdrain
·
501d
The statement 'It was Eric Garner. Do all black brutality victims look alike to you?' is part of a Twitter conversation addressing issues of racial brutality and public discourse surrounding it. The statement directly engages with public issues, specifically the confusion or misidentification in discussions about victims of police brutality, which is a significant societal concern. Therefore, it constitutes public discourse.
- The statement aims to correct a perceived error or oversight without causing harm, though its confrontational tone might not fully align with the principle of doing no harm.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of individuals by correcting an error that could perpetuate harmful stereotypes or misinformation. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- While the statement seeks to clarify and correct misinformation, its confrontational tone may not effectively promote understanding or compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of criticism but does so in a manner that might be seen as slightly aggressive rather than purely constructive.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to highlight an important issue regarding racial brutality, contributing positively to societal discourse. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by participating in a public debate on a sensitive issue, using the platform to address misinformation. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.