The statement is a passionate plea against the use of unvetted AI technology in judicial decisions, specifically in the context of incarcerating individuals. It emphasizes skepticism towards blind trust in technology without proper scrutiny and validation. The tone is urgent and somewhat aggressive, indicated by the use of strong language ('Fück “trust me”'). The content directly addresses a significant public issue related to technology, justice, and human rights, making it a part of public discourse.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement aims to prevent harm caused by unverified AI systems in legal contexts, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words and actions.
[+2]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement respects the dignity of individuals who might be unjustly affected by AI in the judicial system, supporting the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others.
[+2]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.While the statement is driven by a desire to protect individuals, its aggressive tone may not effectively promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in a critical dialogue about the use of AI in legal systems but does so in a confrontational manner, which might detract from constructive criticism.
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement uses its influence to advocate for a critical review and responsible use of AI, aiming for the betterment of society.
[+2]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement upholds the principles of free speech by using the platform to raise important issues about AI and justice, though the integrity of the message could be impacted by its aggressive tone.
[+1]