Peter H. Diamandis, MD
@PeterDiamandis
·
554d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the reliability and societal impact of AI technology, specifically ChatGPT. It critiques the technology's performance and the public's perception, responding to a previous comment about human adaptation to technology.
- The statement might be seen as harsh but does not seem to intend harm. It expresses a critical viewpoint on a technology.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on the technology rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks a tone of empathy or compassion, focusing instead on criticism of the technology. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of dialogue by responding to another's comment, though it could be perceived as dismissive rather than constructively critical.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to prompt a reconsideration of the technology's value, potentially aiming for a better societal understanding of such tools. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.