Marianne Williamson

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 135

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the impact of a significant policy, the 2017 tax cut, and its implications on different economic classes. It also critiques the actions of political parties in relation to economic policies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm but does use strong language ('obscene') which could be seen as slightly aggressive.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on policy rather than personal attributes. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement attempts to promote understanding by explaining the perceived benefits of the tax cut across different economic classes, though it could enhance empathy by acknowledging broader economic impacts.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of the Democratic Party's actions regarding tax policies. However, the use of charged language ('obscene') might detract slightly from fostering a fully constructive dialogue.
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to critique and suggest improvements in economic policies, aiming for societal betterment through more equitable fiscal measures. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by sharing a perspective on a public policy issue responsibly, contributing to the broader dialogue on economic policies. [+1]