Marianne Williamson

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 135
In reply to:

The statement in question is a response in a thread discussing political and social issues, specifically addressing U.S. foreign policy and accusations of anti-Semitism. The tone is confrontational and accusatory, particularly in addressing another user's comments as 'anti-Semitic bile.' The intent seems to be to criticize both U.S. foreign policy and the rhetoric of another user, aiming to correct perceived misinformation or harmful narratives.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement attempts to do no harm by correcting what the speaker sees as harmful anti-Semitic rhetoric. However, the use of 'profoundly ugly take' could be seen as harsh, potentially doing harm in the discourse.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of others by defending a group against anti-Semitism, but the direct attack on another's comment as 'bile' could be seen as lacking respect for the dignity of the person being addressed. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The speaker attempts to promote understanding by clarifying what they believe to be a misrepresentation (anti-Semitism), but the confrontational tone may not effectively promote empathy or compassion. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    While the intent is to engage in constructive criticism regarding a serious issue, the approach includes personal attacks ('ugly take', 'anti-Semitic bile'), which detracts from constructive dialogue. [-2]