In reply to:
The statement '@DrJillStein @CrisM38 Divestment from Boeing I agree with.' is a response to a broader conversation about student activism and support for a social movement, as initiated by Jill Stein. The statement expresses agreement with the idea of divesting from Boeing, which can be interpreted as a stance on corporate ethics or influence in socio-political issues. This response is part of a public discourse as it engages with the topic of corporate responsibility and activism.
- The statement does no harm as it simply expresses agreement with a proposed action of divestment, which is a non-violent form of protest or advocacy. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others by not attacking any individual or group, and focuses solely on the issue of divestment. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- While brief, the statement contributes to a broader dialogue about corporate responsibility and ethical investment, promoting a form of understanding about the impact of economic choices on social movements. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to support a specific action (divestment) that is intended to align with ethical or social justice goals, thus using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.