Marianne Williamson

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 132
5/4/2024, 1:30:14 PM
X
In reply to:
Enraged cog in the machine
@EnragedCog
·
184d
@marwilliamson What year is it again?!
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
184d
When a woman is seeking a divorce during pregnancy, there’s a very good chance she’s concerned for the safety of her child and knows she needs to get away from the man for that reason.
First, they started telling us whether or not we could have an abortion. Now they try…
philip lewis
@Phil_Lewis_
·
185d
Missouri law requires women seeking divorce to disclose whether they're pregnant — and state judges won't finalize divorces during a pregnancy https://www.npr.org/2024/05/03/1…

The statement '@EnragedCog I know. We are taking great strides backwards.' is a response in a thread discussing the implications of certain state laws on women's rights, specifically regarding divorce and pregnancy. The tone of the statement is critical and implies a negative view of the current legal trends affecting women's autonomy. The content of the statement, while brief, clearly engages with a public issue, namely the legal restrictions placed on women seeking divorce during pregnancy. This qualifies as public discourse as it contributes to a broader conversation about women's rights and legal policies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight a perceived regression in policies without causing harm, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    While brief, the statement promotes understanding of the speaker's perspective on the issue, showing empathy for those affected by the laws. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism of the policies without personal attacks, focusing on the issue rather than individuals. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to highlight and potentially rally opposition against regressive policies, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly using the platform to discuss a significant public issue. [+1]