In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
551d
The statement '@generic_void @RosenzweigJane also the stuff he wants to build (at the scale he wants to build it) would be terrible for the environment.' is part of a larger conversation about the environmental impact of certain technological developments. This conversation addresses the use of resources and environmental concerns, which are substantive public issues. Therefore, the statement constitutes public discourse.
- The statement raises a concern about environmental harm, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement indirectly promotes understanding by highlighting potential environmental impacts, which could foster a more informed discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement is part of a constructive dialogue about the implications of technological developments, although it could be more detailed to enhance understanding. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to raise awareness about environmental issues, contributing to the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.