Marianne Williamson

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 132

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of press freedom and the role of journalists and news sources in supporting Julian Assange. It critiques the integrity and independence of the media, suggesting that those who do not support Assange are influenced by external pressures or interests.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement implies harm by accusing journalists and news sources of being 'bought and paid for,' which could be seen as damaging to their reputation. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others in a general sense but uses a broad accusation which might be seen as a form of verbal attack against journalists collectively. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it generalizes negatively about journalists and news sources. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of dialogue about a public issue but does so by making a sweeping generalization rather than offering constructive criticism or engaging in a nuanced discussion. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement attempts to use influence to highlight an issue of press freedom and justice for Julian Assange, which could be seen as aiming for the betterment of society. However, the approach might undermine this principle due to its accusatory tone. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses the platform to discuss an important issue of free speech and justice but does so in a way that might not be seen as responsible or with integrity due to the accusatory and generalized nature of the comment. [-1]