Jill Stien

The statement 'Vote for Jill Stein because she is one of the few politicians who is not bought by AIPAC' is a political endorsement that engages in public discourse by discussing the influence of political donations on politicians. The statement implies that Jill Stein's independence from AIPAC's financial influence is a reason to vote for her, suggesting a stance on political integrity and the influence of lobbying groups in politics.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to highlight the issue of political donations and influence, which is a significant aspect of public concern. However, the phrasing could be seen as promoting a divisive narrative by singling out AIPAC, which might not contribute constructively to the discourse.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the dignity of Jill Stein by promoting her perceived independence, but it could be seen as lacking respect for others by implying that other politicians are compromised without substantiating this claim. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy towards different perspectives, especially regarding the role and influence of AIPAC. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   There is a lack of constructive dialogue as the statement does not invite discussion but rather presents a pointed view. [-1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its influence to promote a political candidate, which aligns with the principle of using influence for societal benefit, assuming the context values political independence. [+1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement could be seen as partially responsible but may lack integrity if the claim about AIPAC's influence is not substantiated with evidence.