The statement reflects on a historical event, specifically the shooting of students by American troops on May 4th, 1970, which is known as the Kent State shootings. The speaker shares a personal account of the impact this event had on their sense of safety and their understanding of civil liberties, which contributes to a broader discussion on historical memory and the implications of state violence.
- The statement does no harm and instead shares a personal perspective on a significant historical event, fostering a deeper understanding of its impact. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The speaker respects the dignity of those affected by the event by solemnly recalling the incident and its profound impact on students and academic communities. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by sharing a personal experience that may resonate with others who remember the event or are learning about it. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- While not engaging in a direct dialogue, the statement sets a tone that could encourage constructive discussions about historical events and their contemporary relevance. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The speaker uses their personal narrative to contribute to societal understanding of past injustices, potentially influencing contemporary discussions on civil rights and state power. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly uses the platform to discuss a public issue, maintaining integrity and contributing to public knowledge and awareness. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.