In reply to:
Chairman Runks
@acmonks
·
533d
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
533d
The statement in question is part of a broader conversation on Twitter involving multiple users discussing journalistic integrity, media bias, and the transparency of information shared in the 'Twitter Files'. The statement specifically asks for clarification or correction regarding potential inaccuracies in the 'Twitter Files', which is a collection of internal Twitter communications released to the public that discuss content moderation practices and decisions. This conversation touches upon issues of media transparency, bias, and the integrity of information, which are relevant to public discourse.
- The statement aims to clarify information and does not cause harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The question promotes understanding by seeking clarification on potentially inaccurate information. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages constructively by asking a direct question without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By asking for clarification, the statement implicitly supports the correction of mistakes if inaccuracies are identified. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The user utilizes the platform to engage in a responsible discussion about media integrity and transparency. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.