Matt Taibbi

Rank 33 of 47
|
Score -35
5/5/2024, 6:21:59 PM
X
In reply to:
SomethingIsFischy ✡️ ⚽︎ 🦀 🧦👈🏼
@edfischman
·
498d
@mtaibbi @briebriejoy Which profession are you referring to?

Podcasters code?
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
498d
Whatever they say, it doesn’t change the fact that @briebriejoy has now made nine serious factual errors about me on air and twice refused to answer letters proposing a resolution with quiet corrections. Total lack of basic ethics and professional courtesy.
Ashmead's Kernel
@_alley_oop
·
498d
@MikeK_LA @mtaibbi I don’t agree with everything, but BJG and Zaid make some good points here: https://www.patreon.com/rss/badf…

The statement in question is part of a broader conversation about journalistic ethics and professional standards, specifically addressing the issue of correcting factual errors in public communications. This discussion is inherently linked to public discourse as it deals with the integrity and accountability of media and public figures, which are crucial elements in maintaining informed and fair public dialogue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement promotes the principle of doing no harm by advocating for the correction of factual errors, thus aiming to prevent the spread of misinformation. [+2]
  2. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement directly supports the principle of acknowledging and correcting mistakes, emphasizing the standard practice in journalism to run corrections when errors are made. [+2]
  3. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of using one's platform responsibly and with integrity by highlighting the importance of corrections in journalistic work, which contributes to the credibility and trustworthiness of the media. [+2]