Gary Marcus

The statement engages in a technical discussion about the reliability of computational systems, specifically referencing the Pentium floating point division flaw and comparing it to the reliability of large language models (LLMs) in handling similar tasks. The tone is informative and contributes to a broader conversation about technological reliability and advancements.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does no harm as it merely provides factual information and a perspective on technological reliability. [+1]
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding by providing specific information and context about a historical tech issue, enhancing comprehension of the topic. [+1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages constructively by adding factual context to an ongoing discussion about computational errors without any personal attacks or derogatory language. [+1]