Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement in question is a critical comment directed at Columbia Law School, questioning the institution's oversight regarding student groups and their messages, particularly concerning accusations of promoting antisemitism and violence. The statement is a response to a prior message from a student group that includes strong political statements regarding Jewish students and the situation in Palestine, which the commenter interprets as promoting antisemitism and violence.
- The statement potentially harms by accusing the institution and its student groups of promoting antisemitism and violence without providing a constructive pathway for resolution or dialogue. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of those it aims to defend but could be seen as disrespectful towards those it accuses, potentially exacerbating tensions rather than fostering understanding. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The accusatory tone of the statement may not effectively promote understanding or empathy between conflicting groups or viewpoints. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not encourage constructive dialogue or offer solutions, focusing instead on condemnation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge the complexity of the issues involved or seek to correct any broader misunderstandings that may exist. [-1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- While the statement aims to use influence to address perceived injustices, the approach taken may not necessarily lead to a betterment of society if it leads to increased division or misunderstanding.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement uses the platform to raise serious concerns, which is responsible, but the lack of constructive engagement might not fully uphold the integrity of public discourse.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.