Reposted by Ilhan Omar
Rep. Elise Stefanik
@RepStefanik
·
423d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of labeling campus protesters as 'terrorists' and connecting it to broader themes of authoritarian control and the situation in Gaza. It critiques the rhetoric used by public figures in discussing campus protests and their implications for free speech and activism.
- The statement aims to counter harmful rhetoric but uses strong language ('sick joke') which could be seen as slightly harmful itself.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of the protesters by defending them against harsh labels, but it does not directly invade anyone's privacy. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- It promotes understanding of the consequences of labeling dissent as terrorism, showing empathy towards the protesters. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- While the statement engages with the opposing view, the use of terms like 'sick joke' might detract from constructive dialogue.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to highlight and potentially correct what it views as a misuse of language in public discourse. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by criticizing the use of language that could suppress activism and dissent. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.