Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64

The statement '@CarlPham9000 Bullshit conquers all, but not forever.' is a response in a chain of conversations discussing the effectiveness and future of AI systems. The statement uses informal language and a dismissive tone to express skepticism or cynicism about the prevailing situation or opinions being discussed.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause direct harm but uses harsh language that could be perceived as offensive, slightly undermining the principle of doing no harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and does not involve harassment, aligning with the principle of respecting the dignity of others. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The use of the term 'bullshit' may detract from fostering understanding or compassion, as it could be seen as dismissive rather than engaging constructively. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses a dismissive tone rather than fostering meaningful discussion. [-1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    There is no indication of acknowledging or correcting mistakes, as the statement does not address accuracy or provide constructive feedback.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement does not use its influence to better society but rather expresses a cynical view without proposing solutions or improvements. [-1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The use of informal and potentially offensive language may not uphold the integrity expected in responsible use of platforms for public discourse. [-1]