The statement by Andrew Yang at TED Talks addresses a significant public issue, specifically the design and functioning of the American electoral system. Yang identifies a problem (design flaw in the electoral system) and proposes a solution (Ranked Choice Voting), which directly engages with public policy and societal improvement. This qualifies as public discourse.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement aims to address a systemic issue without causing harm, focusing on constructive change.
[+2]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement respects the dignity of others and does not engage in harassment or hate speech.
[+1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.Yang uses his platform to promote understanding of a complex issue and advocates for a solution intended to improve the electoral process.
[+2]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement invites constructive dialogue on electoral reform without personal attacks, focusing on the issue rather than individuals.
[+2]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.Yang uses his influence to advocate for what he believes would better society by improving the electoral system.
[+2]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement responsibly uses the platform of a TED Talk to discuss free speech and public policy, maintaining integrity in public discourse.
[+2]