The statement is a critique of the perceived inadequacy of the financial commitment by OpenAI and Microsoft towards educating the public on the potential harms of AI-generated media. The sarcastic tone ('Clap ... clap … clap') suggests that the speaker believes the contribution is insufficient given the companies' substantial combined worth.
- The statement does not cause harm but uses sarcasm to criticize, which might not foster a constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others as it does not target individuals but corporate actions. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The use of sarcasm might detract from promoting understanding and empathy, focusing instead on criticism without offering a constructive alternative. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not encourage a constructive dialogue due to its sarcastic tone. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge any positive efforts the companies might be making, which could be seen as a failure to correct or acknowledge broader contexts. [-1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses its influence to highlight a perceived discrepancy in corporate responsibility, which could be seen as beneficial for societal awareness. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by critiquing corporate actions, but the sarcastic tone might undermine the responsible use of this freedom.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.