Reposted by Gary Marcus
Dare Obasanjo🐀
@Carnage4Life
·
600d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the development and impact of AI technology by OpenAI, a significant topic in technology and society. The statement critiques the company's shift in promotional strategy and expresses skepticism about future product releases, which invites further dialogue on corporate transparency and technological advancements.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with its words, focusing instead on a critical perspective of OpenAI's product strategy. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on the company's actions without targeting individuals negatively. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- While critical, the statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on expressing skepticism and prompting discussion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of OpenAI's promotional strategies without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to prompt a discussion on corporate responsibility in technology, indirectly aiming for the betterment of society by advocating for transparency. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement uses the platform responsibly, raising valid concerns about corporate practices in technology development and release. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.