Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
5/8/2024, 6:00:43 PM
X
In reply to:
Minh Do
@minhsmind
·
600d
@GaryMarcus Is that what’s he’s saying? Seems like he’s saying the opposite, that we aren’t taking the potential economic impact seriously enough. @sama
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
600d
*Everything* that I say that infuriates the fan boys eventually gets acknowledged by OpenAI. Example; I said that GPT-4 would not have a huge economic impact; lots of people yelled at me.

Now Sam himself says it.

Same pattern over and over and over.
Tsarathustra
@tsarnick
·
600d
Sam Altman is worried that because GPT-4 failed to have a huge economic impact, we may underestimate the changes future AI models will cause

The statement in question is part of a broader conversation about the economic impact of AI technologies, specifically GPT-4, and the potential implications of future AI models. The user criticizes another individual's acknowledgment of the economic impact as being too late and speculative about future developments. This discussion touches upon the societal implications of technology and its economic effects, which is a matter of public interest.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to critique perceived spin in communication about AI's economic impact, which could be seen as an attempt to prevent misinformation or misunderstanding, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of others by focusing on the argument and the subject matter rather than personal attacks, aligning with the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The tone of the statement is critical but not disrespectful or harmful, aiming to foster a clearer understanding of the topic, which aligns with promoting understanding and compassion. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a critical analysis of another's viewpoint, contributing to a broader dialogue about AI's impact, which aligns with engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The user acknowledges a change in the narrative around AI's economic impact, which aligns with acknowledging and correcting mistakes in the broader discourse. [+1]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By discussing the implications of AI and its economic impact, the statement uses its platform to contribute to societal understanding of important technological developments, aligning with using influence for the betterment of society. [+1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by sharing a viewpoint in a public forum on a significant issue, aligning with using the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+1]