Jake Tapper

Rank 9 of 47
|
Score 127

The statement reports on a significant political event involving Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene's action to file a Motion to Vacate against Speaker Johnson, and includes a comment from Rep. Dusty Johnson labeling it as a 'temper tantrum.' This statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a substantive political issue concerning leadership dynamics within a governmental body.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement itself does not directly cause harm but reports on a potentially divisive political action.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the individuals involved by sticking to their public roles and actions. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, particularly with the use of the phrase 'temper tantrum,' which could be seen as dismissive. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The use of the term 'temper tantrum' by Rep. Dusty Johnson may not foster constructive dialogue or criticism but could be viewed as a personal attack, reducing the potential for productive discourse. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement reports on an action intended to influence the leadership of the House, which could be seen as using influence for what the involved parties believe to be the betterment of society, though this is subjective and could be contentious.