Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57
5/10/2024, 1:31:07 AM
X
In reply to:
Dan Chern
@DanChern
·
421d
@marwilliamson Gov’t mandated debt “forgiveness” destroys wealth.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
421d
Good start. Now propose and pass Medicare for All or the debt just begins accumulating again.
But then you knew that, didn’t you Gentlemen?
unusual_whales
@unusual_whales
·
422d
BREAKING: Senator Bernie Sanders and Congressman Ro Khanna are proposing a new bill to eliminate all medical debt.

The bill would create a federal grant program to cancel all medical debt and block creditors from collecting past medical bills.

The statement '@DanChern How does it destroy wealth? Putting more hands into people, it stimulates wealth!' is part of a public discourse on government policies regarding debt forgiveness and economic implications. The tone is inquisitive and somewhat assertive, aiming to challenge the view that government-mandated debt forgiveness destroys wealth and instead suggests that it could stimulate economic activity.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words; it simply presents an alternative economic perspective. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing solely on the policy discussion without any personal attacks or disrespectful language. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By presenting an alternative view, the statement contributes to a broader understanding of the potential benefits of debt forgiveness, promoting a form of economic empathy. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by questioning a previously expressed opinion without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to discuss potential societal benefits of a policy, aiming for the betterment of society through economic stimulation. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech responsibly, contributing to a public policy debate without misinformation or harmful rhetoric. [+1]