Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the impact of AI bots on the job application process, suggesting that it negatively affects job seekers and benefits large AI companies. The accompanying image from The Wall Street Journal illustrates the chaotic interaction between humans and AI in this context, emphasizing the overwhelming influence of technology in modern hiring practices.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight a significant issue regarding the use of AI in hiring, suggesting a need for scrutiny and possibly regulation to prevent harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of those affected by AI in hiring processes by advocating on behalf of job seekers. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by identifying a potential problem with AI in hiring, though it could be seen as somewhat one-sided by not presenting potential benefits or solutions.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a critical dialogue about the role of AI in society, though it could improve by suggesting constructive alternatives or improvements.
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about a societal issue, which could lead to discussions on better practices in AI applications in hiring. [+1]