Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
5/13/2024, 9:00:06 PM
X
In reply to:
Tim Spalding 🇺🇦
@librarythingtim
·
597d
@GaryMarcus Your beat is the limitations of LLMs, and I am with you there. But 2x faster and cheaper is significant, and will enable new things. If @cshirky says "more is different," so is faster and cheaper.
Tim Spalding 🇺🇦
@librarythingtim
·
597d
Some quick tests on a process we use on https://www.talpa.ai/. TLDR: GPT-4o is faster than all GPT-4 models and even GPT 3.5.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
597d
GPT-4o hot take:
• The speech synthesis is terrific, reminds me of Google Duplex (which never took off).
but
• If OpenAI had GPT-5, they have would shown it.
• They don’t have GPT-5 after 14 months of trying.
• The most important figure in the blogpost is attached below. And…

The statement in question is part of a broader conversation about the performance and cost-effectiveness of various language models, including GPT-4 and its iterations. The user is engaging in a technical discussion by querying about the services offered by 'Claude' in relation to its cost, which is a response to a previous statement about the significance of faster and cheaper services in enabling new capabilities.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm as it is a neutral inquiry about the cost-effectiveness of AI services. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not involve any personal information or derogatory content. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The user uses their words to contribute to a technical discussion, which can help promote understanding among those interested in AI developments. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement is part of a constructive dialogue about AI capabilities, engaging with other users' observations and claims. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    There is no indication of any mistakes being made that need correction. [+1]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The user is using their influence to engage in a technical discussion, which can be seen as contributing positively to the community interested in AI. [+1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by contributing responsibly to a public technical discussion. [+1]