In reply to:
Abdulmajeed
@CreativeS3lf
·
597d
The statement '@CreativeS3lf yes but it makes silly errors and hallucinates, same as before...' is a critical response to a previous comment praising the capabilities of a model. The statement points out perceived limitations or flaws in the model, suggesting that despite improvements, it still makes errors similar to previous versions.
- The statement aims to provide a counterpoint to overly positive claims, which could help in preventing harm by setting realistic expectations about the technology. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others by focusing on the technology rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The comment promotes understanding by highlighting potential issues with the technology that may not be apparent in the initial positive review. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The criticism is constructive as it points out specific flaws (errors and hallucinations) without derogatory language or hostility. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement acknowledges the ongoing issues with the model, suggesting a need for correction or improvement in future iterations. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- By providing a critical perspective, the statement uses its influence to encourage a more balanced view of the technology. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by contributing a dissenting opinion in a respectful manner. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.