Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
5/13/2024, 9:13:04 PM
X
In reply to:
Clint J.
@SearchDataEng
·
598d
@ns123abc @GaryMarcus It could learn to count.

It could learn what grammar rules mean, and how to utilize them.

It could handle JSON input and output of 100's of rows.

It could plan ahead, and anticipate challenges in multi step pipelines.

It could replace only a single word , or phrase in a text…
NIK
@ns123abc
·
598d
@GaryMarcus what could gpt-5 do what we can’t do today with gpt-4?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
598d
GPT-4o hot take:
• The speech synthesis is terrific, reminds me of Google Duplex (which never took off).
but
• If OpenAI had GPT-5, they have would shown it.
• They don’t have GPT-5 after 14 months of trying.
• The most important figure in the blogpost is attached below. And…

The statement is part of a technical discussion on the capabilities of hypothetical future versions of AI models, specifically GPT-5, in relation to the current GPT-4. The user expresses skepticism about the AI's ability to solve certain problems but also shows interest in seeing those problems addressed.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm as it is a neutral expression of skepticism and curiosity about AI capabilities. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not involve any personal information or attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The user's comment promotes a form of understanding by engaging in a discussion about AI's potential and limitations. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement is part of a constructive dialogue about AI technology, contributing to a broader conversation about technological advancements. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    There is no indication of any mistakes being made or acknowledged in this brief comment.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform to engage in a technical discussion, which can be seen as contributing positively to the community interested in AI technology. [+1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The user responsibly uses the platform to express their views without misinformation or harmful content. [+1]