Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
5/13/2024, 9:20:00 PM
X
In reply to:
oidestio
@oidestio
·
598d
@roddyrockets @GaryMarcus I think that Gary is relatively intelligent and can use his time in much more productive ways but he just wakes up every morning and thinks "how am I going to trash talk today this new scifi technology for not being good enough"
Roddy
@roddyrockets
·
598d
@GaryMarcus Gary continues to have the absolute worst takes in the industry
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
598d
GPT-4o hot take:
• The speech synthesis is terrific, reminds me of Google Duplex (which never took off).
but
• If OpenAI had GPT-5, they have would shown it.
• They don’t have GPT-5 after 14 months of trying.
• The most important figure in the blogpost is attached below. And…

The statement in question is part of a broader conversation on Twitter regarding opinions about artificial intelligence technologies and their development. The user expresses skepticism about the effectiveness of 'black box models' in progressing towards Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). This statement engages with public discourse by discussing the impact and approach of current AI technologies, which is a topic of societal and technological relevance.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm but rather contributes to a technical discussion on AI development. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of others and does not engage in personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The comment is focused on AI technology and does not involve empathy or compassion directly.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement contributes to a dialogue about AI technology, although it could be more constructive by providing more context or alternative solutions.
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    There is no indication of acknowledging or correcting mistakes; the statement is an opinion.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The user uses their platform to express a viewpoint on AI development, contributing to the broader discussion on the topic. [+1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by sharing a personal opinion on a public platform responsibly. [+1]