Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement by @GaryMarcus addresses concerns about the potential ethical implications of AI technologies, particularly focusing on how they might be engineered to prioritize impressiveness over truthfulness. This critique is part of a broader discussion on the responsibilities of AI developers and the impact of AI on public perception and truth.
- The statement aims to highlight potential harms in misleading AI functionalities, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By focusing on the broader implications of AI, the statement respects the dignity of the public by advocating for transparency and truth, supporting the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The critique promotes understanding and awareness about AI technologies, thus fostering empathy and compassion among the public and AI developers. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI development practices, encouraging dialogue about the ethical design of AI systems. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The user uses their influence to raise important ethical considerations, aiming to better society's approach to AI development. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly uses the platform to discuss significant societal issues concerning AI, upholding the principles of free speech and integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.