In reply to:
The statement '@Ahmekal where’s the evidence, exactly?' is a response in a conversation about the capabilities of GPT-4 and its implications for coding and artificial general intelligence (AGI). The statement seeks clarification or substantiation of a claim made about the ease of coding with the new technology. This can be considered public discourse as it engages with the topic of technological advancement and its impact, which is a matter of public interest.
- The statement does not cause harm but seeks clarification, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The request for evidence indirectly promotes understanding by encouraging factual backing in discussions about technology. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by asking for evidence rather than dismissing the claim outright or using personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.