Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
5/13/2024, 10:05:29 PM
X
In reply to:
Colonel Tasty
@JoshhuaSays
·
598d
@GaryMarcus Gary I really think you're an important counterbalance to the insane hype behind LLMs but look at what's been shown today. This is literal science fiction stuff. It really seems like the good criticism you gave before Congress has given way to just unwavering hatred. Kinda sad…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
598d
@JoshhuaSays which goal post has shifted, pray tell.
Colonel Tasty
@JoshhuaSays
·
598d
@GaryMarcus This reeks of cope and goalpost shifting.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
598d
GPT-4o hot take:
• The speech synthesis is terrific, reminds me of Google Duplex (which never took off).
but
• If OpenAI had GPT-5, they have would shown it.
• They don’t have GPT-5 after 14 months of trying.
• The most important figure in the blogpost is attached below. And…

The statement by @JoshhuaSays expresses skepticism about the effectiveness of Large Language Models (LLMs) as a pathway to achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and criticizes the allocation of resources towards LLMs. It suggests that these efforts may be distracting from more viable paths to AGI.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm as it is a critique based on the speaker's perspective on technological development and resource allocation. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of others by focusing on the topic of LLMs and AGI without attacking any individuals directly. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by highlighting a concern that LLMs might not be the most effective path to AGI, which could foster further discussion on resource allocation in AI research. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out what the speaker perceives as a misdirection in current AI research efforts. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement acknowledges a potential mistake in the current focus of AI research, suggesting that resources might be better allocated elsewhere. [+1]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform to discuss the implications of current trends in AI research, contributing to a broader conversation about the future of technology. [+1]