Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
5/14/2024, 6:18:30 AM
X
In reply to:
Erik Bethke
@BethkeErik
·
602d
@GaryMarcus @tegmark Why would you even write this?

It is not an impactful comment in any lens.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
603d
@tegmark I offered Elon a related bet here and stand by this (what I should have clarified there though was that it has to be one general model to count as AGI, not three+ separate models):

https://garymarcus.substack.com/…
Max Tegmark
@tegmark
·
603d
To those of you who claiming that smarter-than-human AI is decades away, what *specific tasks* are you willing to bet me that AI won't be able to do within 5 years?
Rowan Cheung
@rowancheung
·
603d
OpenAI just announced ChatGPT's new real-time conversational chat.

The model can understand both audio AND video, and can even detect emotion in your voice.

This is insane.

The statement in question is part of a broader discussion on artificial general intelligence (AGI) and its implications. The user expresses dissatisfaction with another participant's tone and mentions unfollowing them due to this. The statement also references a previous discussion that provided specific criteria relevant to the ongoing conversation about AGI.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm but expresses a personal reaction to perceived tone, which could be seen as mildly confrontational.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of others by addressing the tone rather than making personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The user attempts to engage in dialogue by referencing specific criteria discussed earlier, which could promote understanding. However, the mention of unfollowing might detract from constructive dialogue.
  4. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The user acknowledges their reaction to the tone, which shows a willingness to correct or clarify the nature of the interaction. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement indirectly contributes to the broader discussion on AGI by referencing specific criteria relevant to the debate, thus using the platform to engage in a substantive issue. [+1]