Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
5/14/2024, 10:16:56 AM
X
In reply to:
Edoardo Maggio
@northead
·
607d
@GaryMarcus I appreciate your moderate, anti-hype stance, but can't for the life of me get how the fact that it's not out yet means that we (they) have hit a wall.
Edoardo Maggio
@northead
·
607d
@GaryMarcus Instead of this seemingly senseless crusade, why not just think that... it's not ready yet? And considering that they are still leading and squeezing more value out of GPT-4's architecture, there's no need to rush out whatever they have (read: a non-polished model) just yet?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
607d
Top 5 Reasons Why GPT-5 hasn’t come out yet.

5. Data center larger than the universe not yet fully constructed.
4. Still putting on the finishing touches, should be out next week/month/end of summer/by Fall.
3. They already have it, but are just toying with us.
2. They already…

The statement in question is part of a broader conversation about the development and release of AI technologies, specifically GPT-5. The discourse involves a critique and discussion of the reasons behind the delay in releasing the new AI model, which is a topic of public interest particularly in the tech community. This qualifies as public discourse because it engages with issues related to technology development, corporate strategy, and public expectations.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, maintaining a neutral and informative tone. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing solely on the topic without personal attacks or sensitive information. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement indirectly promotes understanding by inviting further reading on the topic, suggesting a desire to inform or clarify. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of constructive dialogue by suggesting additional resources for understanding, though it does not directly address disagreement. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to inform and potentially correct misunderstandings or misinformation about AI development. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses the platform responsibly, contributing to the discourse on AI technology responsibly and with integrity. [+1]