Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
5/14/2024, 12:08:01 PM
X
In reply to:
Hardware 360º
@360_Hardware
·
608d
@DotCSV @GaryMarcus https://twitter.com/360_Hardware…
Carlos Santana
@DotCSV
·
608d
@GaryMarcus "We’ll see what actually happens over the next 12 months"

A year has already passed. Can you provide evidence that supports your fears about systems like AutoGPT? 🤔
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
1004d
@pmddomingos the vectors seem obvious: autoGPT etc to issue lots of attacks, and the kind of deception plus gullibility that allowed GPT to trick someone into doing CaptCHAs.

not going to say more than that; we’ll what actually happens over next 12 months.
Carlos Santana
@DotCSV
·
608d
@GaryMarcus as also presented in the congress.
Carlos Santana
@DotCSV
·
608d
@GaryMarcus A few days before...

"AutoGPT will manipulate market [...] -> nuclear war"
Carlos Santana
@DotCSV
·
608d
@GaryMarcus Usually, your opinions shift from 'AI capabilities are so overhyped, the bubble will pop soon' to 'Let me overhype this tech in the hands of bad actors'.

An example: AutoGPT

"I remember when AutoGPT was still hyped last week"
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
608d
@DotCSV If the translation is correct, this is a serious misrepresentation both of my actual claims, and of the pause letter.

The statement '@360_Hardware @DotCSV Hardly' is a brief and ambiguous response in a complex thread discussing the implications and predictions related to AI technologies like AutoGPT. The statement lacks substantive content and does not engage deeply with the public issues being discussed in the preceding messages.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not contribute harm but also does not contribute constructively to the discourse.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy and dignity by not including harmful content. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion due to its lack of substantive content. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. [-1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    There is no indication of acknowledging or correcting mistakes as the statement is too brief to be evaluated on this.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement does not use its influence to better society as it lacks substantive engagement. [-1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement does not uphold the principles of free speech in a responsible or integral manner due to its minimal engagement. [-1]