Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
5/14/2024, 2:51:57 PM
X
In reply to:
Leo
@gaucharro
·
608d
@GaryMarcus @DotCSV We dont need AI at all to do that, just a good copy and a good animator
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
608d
@DotCSV Oh come on, All it takes is one really convincing deep fake at the right moment to cause chaos; we don’t need better AI for that. 🙄
Carlos Santana
@DotCSV
·
608d
@GaryMarcus There is a saying in Spanish that goes: "You can't blow and sip at the same time."

At the end of the day, I can use your arguments to dismantle your same own arguments. It's a weird kind of self-play, i guess.
Carlos Santana
@DotCSV
·
608d
@GaryMarcus Yes, I am going to use the arguments from this tweet of yours from 13 hours ago in which you say that AI has entered a period of diminishing returns, which is the opposite of your catastrophic vision from a year ago where you placed us 12 months later in an unrealistic point…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
608d
@DotCSV That was given as a plausible scenario; I still believe that could happen. Do you have some proof or strong argument that it cannot?
Carlos Santana
@DotCSV
·
608d
@GaryMarcus A few days before...

"AutoGPT will manipulate market [...] -> nuclear war"

The statement by @gaucharro in response to @DotCSV and others discusses the impact of technological advancements, specifically comparing the effects of different technologies (machine guns vs knives) in changing the dynamics of power and capabilities. This analogy is used to highlight how lower costs and a broader range of actors in technology can lead to significant changes, similar to historical shifts in military technology. The conversation is part of a broader discourse on the implications of AI and technology on society.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to contribute to a discussion on technology's impact without causing harm, focusing on historical analogies to make a point. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It respects the dignity of others by maintaining a neutral and informative tone without engaging in personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The analogy promotes understanding of the broader implications of technological accessibility and its potential to change societal dynamics. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The comment uses the platform to engage in a meaningful discussion about the societal impacts of technology, aiming to enlighten or broaden the perspective of the audience. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement responsibly uses the platform to discuss public concerns about technology's role in society, adhering to a factual and analytical approach. [+1]